From sample to interpretation
Every report follows the same transparent pathway
Sample
A collected sample is submitted and logged for processing.
Sequencing
The chosen method (16S, WGS or MetaT) measures microbial signal at its supported depth.
Bioinformatics
Reads are processed against curated references with quality control at each step.
Interpretation
ATLAS organises features into scores, panels and confidence cues — never a diagnosis.
Explore the science
Six topics behind every result
Methodology
The end-to-end sequencing and analysis approach behind every report.
Read more →Reference context
How your sample is compared to reference cohorts — and the limits of that comparison.
Read more →Confidence framework
The visible confidence cue that travels with every score and panel.
Read more →ATLAS framework
How sequencing features become structured, interpretable outputs.
Read more →Panel framework
How related scores are grouped into biological-context panels.
Read more →Bioinformatics pipeline
The processing pipeline, references and quality controls applied to your data.
Read more →How we describe results
Four principles applied to every interpretation
Describe, don’t diagnose
We report microbial composition and ecological context — not disease.
Show the confidence
Every output carries a visible method-support and confidence cue.
Respect the method ceiling
Claims never exceed what the chosen sequencing method can resolve.
Compare with context
Reference comparisons are framed with their limits, not as verdicts.
All science content is educational. It explains sequencing-derived microbial patterns and reference-context comparison — not diagnosis or medical advice.
See the science applied on a real report
Configure a test to choose your ecosystem, sequencing depth and report level. Method scope and limitations are shown throughout.