Skip to content
VAMS LABS™ · platforms

The platforms behind the sequencing layer.

We describe platform categories publicly, not specific instruments. The right category depends on your question and sample; specifics — including any approved partner-lab instrumentation — are confirmed during scoping.

Short-read ampliconShotgun metagenomicsRNA / metatranscriptomicLong-read (scoped)Partner-coordinated instrumentationResearch-use framing

Platform categories

What each platform resolves — and its limits

What each platform resolves — and its limits
Platform category What it resolves Key limit Status
Short-read amplicon sequencing Genus-level taxonomy, diversity, community structure at scale. Limited species/strain resolution; no functional activity. Available via validated workflows
Short-read shotgun metagenomics Species-level structure and genomic functional potential. Depth-dependent; potential is capability, not activity. Available via validated workflows
RNA / metatranscriptomic workflows Expression-context signals under supported conditions. Highly RNA-quality dependent; not guaranteed. Requires scoping
Long-read workflows Discussed during scoping; not asserted as available here. Availability not publicly claimed until verified. Not publicly claimed
Partner platforms & instrumentation Confirmed during scoping by region, assay and project. No specific instrument is named on public pages. Partner-coordinated / requires scoping

Why platform choice matters

What actually changes the result

Read length & depth — Determine how finely taxonomy resolves and how much functional signal is captured.
Taxonomic resolution — Amplicon vs shotgun changes whether you reach genus, species or strain-level context.
Functional-potential context — Shotgun adds genomic capability; it is not proof of activity.
Expression-context limits — Only RNA workflows approach activity, and only where quality supports it.
Batch & QC importance — Batch design and QC materially affect comparability and interpretation.

FAQ

Platform questions

Which platform do you use?

We describe platform categories publicly, not specific instruments. The right category depends on your question and sample; specifics are confirmed during scoping, including any approved partner-lab instrumentation.

Do you offer long-read sequencing?

Long-read workflows are not publicly claimed here; they can be discussed during scoping and confirmed only where verified.

Does a “better” platform always mean a better result?

No. The best platform is the one matched to your question, sample type and design — greater depth is not automatically more useful.

Find the right platform for your question

Tell us your research question and sample type. We’ll recommend a platform category and confirm any partner-lab instrumentation during scoping.